The socioeconomic impact of cancer on patients and their relatives: Organisation of European Cancer Institutes task force consensus recommendations on conceptual framework, taxonomy, and research directions.

Loss of income and out-of-pocket expenditures are important causes of financial hardship in many patients with cancer, even in high-income countries. The far-reaching consequences extend beyond the patients themselves to their relatives, including caregivers and dependents. European research to date has been limited and is hampered by the absence of a coherent theoretical framework and by heterogeneous methods and terminology. To address these shortages, a task force initiated by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) produced 25 recommendations, including a comprehensive definition of socioeconomic impact from the perspective of patients and their relatives, a conceptual framework, and a consistent taxonomy linked to the framework. The OECI task force consensus statement highlights directions for future research with a view towards policy relevance. Beyond descriptive studies into the dimension of the problem, individual severity and predictors of vulnerability should be explored. It is anticipated that the consensus recommendations will facilitate and enhance future research efforts into the socioeconomic impact of cancer and cancer care, providing a crucial reference point for the development and validation of patient-reported outcome instruments aimed at measuring its broader effects.

A repeated cross-sectional analysis on the economic impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic at the hospital level in Italy.

Italy was the first country in Europe to be hit by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. Little research has been conducted to understand the economic impact of providing care for SARS-CoV-2 patients during the pandemic. Our study aims to quantify the incremental healthcare costs for hospitalizations associated to being discharged before or after the first SARS-CoV-2 case was notified in Italy, and to a positive or negative SARS-CoV-2 notified infection. We used data on hospitalizations for 9 different diagnosis related groups at a large Italian Research Hospital with discharge date between 1st January, 2018 and 31st December 2021. The median overall costs for a hospitalization increased from 2410EUR (IQR: 1588-3828) before the start of the pandemic, to 2645EUR (IQR: 1885-4028) and 3834EUR (IQR: 2463-6413) during the pandemic, respectively for patients SARS-CoV-2 negative and positive patients. Interestingly, according to results of a generalized linear model, the highest increases in the average costs sustained for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients with respect to patients discharged before the pandemic was found among those with diagnoses unrelated to COVID-19, i.e. kidney and urinary tract infections with CC (59.71%), intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral infarction (53.33), and pulmonary edema and respiratory failure (47.47%). Our study highlights the economic burden during the COVID-19 pandemic on the hospital system in Italy based on individual patient data. These results contribute to the to the debate around the efficiency of the healthcare services provision during a pandemic.

Post-Acute COVID-19 Joint Pain and New Onset of Rheumatic Musculoskeletal Diseases: A Systematic Review.

As the number of reports of post-acute COVID-19 musculoskeletal manifestations is rapidly rising, it is important to summarize the current available literature in order to shed light on this new and not fully understood phenomenon. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to provide an updated picture of post-acute COVID-19 musculoskeletal manifestations of potential rheumatological interest, with a particular focus on joint pain, new onset of rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases and presence of autoantibodies related to inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies. We included 54 original papers in our systematic review. The prevalence of arthralgia was found to range from 2% to 65% within a time frame varying from 4 weeks to 12 months after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. Inflammatory arthritis was also reported with various clinical phenotypes such as symmetrical polyarthritis with RA-like pattern similar to other prototypical viral arthritis, polymyalgia-like symptoms, or acute monoarthritis and oligoarthritis of large joints resembling reactive arthritis. Moreover, high figures of post-COVID-19 patients fulfilling the classification criteria for fibromyalgia were found, ranging from 31% to 40%. Finally, the available literature about prevalence of rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies was largely inconsistent. In conclusion, manifestations of rheumatological interest such as joint pain, new-onset inflammatory arthritis and fibromyalgia are frequently reported after COVID-19, highlighting the potential role of SARS-CoV-2 as a trigger for the development of autoimmune conditions and rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet reconstruction in anterior shoulder instability.

PURPOSE: The ideal surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability is still under debate. In the healthcare setting, both clinical and economic factors must be considered for optimal resource allocation. From the clinical perspective, the Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS) is a helpful and validated tool for surgeons, although a gray area between 4 and 6 exists. In fact, patients with an ISIS < 4 and > 6 can be treated effectively with arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet, respectively. The purpose of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet in patients with an ISIS between 4 and 6. METHODS: A decision-tree model was constructed to simulate the clinical scenario of an anterior shoulder dislocation patient with an ISIS between 4 and 6. Based on previously published literature, outcome probabilities and utility values in the form of Western Ontario Instability Score (WOSI) were assigned to each branch of the tree, alongside institutional cost. The primary outcome assessed was an Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the two procedures. Eden-Hybbinette was also considered in the model as a salvage procedure for failed Latarjet. A two-way sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the most impactful parameters on the ICER upon their variation within a pre-determined interval. RESULTS: Base case cost was 1245.57 € (1220.48-1270.65 €) for arthroscopic Bankart repair, 1623.10 € (1580.82-1665.39 €) for open Latarjet and 2.373.95 € (1940.81-2807.10 €) for Eden-Hybbinette. Base-case ICER was 9570.23 €/WOSI. Sensitivity analysis showed that the most impactful parameters were the utility of arthroscopic Bankart repair, the probability of success of open Latarjet, the probability of undergoing surgery after post-operative recurrence of instability and the utility of Latarjet. Of these, utility of arthroscopic Bankart repair and Latarjet had the most significant impact on the ICER. CONCLUSION: From a hospital perspective, open Latarjet was more cost-effective than arthroscopic Bankart repair in preventing further shoulder instability in patients with an ISIS between 4 and 6. Despite its several limitations, this is the first study to analyze this subgroup of patients from a European hospital setting from both an economic and clinical perspective. This study can help surgeons and administrations in the decision-making process. Further clinical studies are needed to prospectively analyze both aspects to further delineate the best strategy.

Early Hospital Discharge on Day Two Post Robotic Lobectomy with Telehealth Home Monitoring: A Pilot Study.

Despite the adoption of enhanced recovery programs, the reported postoperative length of stay after robotic surgery is 4 days even in highly specialized centers. We report preliminary results of a pilot study for a new protocol of early discharge (on day 2) with telehealth home monitoring after robotic lobectomy for lung cancer. All patients with a caregiver were discharged on postoperative day 2 with a telemonitoring device if they satisfied specific discharge criteria. Teleconsultations were scheduled once in the afternoon of post-operative day 2, twice on postoperative day 3, and then once a day until the chest tube removal. Post-discharge vital signs were recorded by patients at least four times daily through the device and were available for consultation by two surgeons through phone application. In case of sudden variation of vital signs or occurrence of adverse events, a direct telephone line was available for patients as well as a protected re-hospitalization path. Primary outcome was the safety evaluated by the occurrence of post-discharge complications and readmissions. Secondary outcome was the evaluation of resources optimization (hospitalization days) maintaining the standard of care. During the study period, twelve patients satisfied all preoperative clinical criteria to be enrolled in our protocol. Two of twelve enrolled patients were successively excluded because they did not satisfy discharge criteria on postoperative day 2. During telehealth home monitoring a total of 27/427 vital-sign measurements violated the threshold in seven patients. Among the threshold violations, only 1 out of 27 was a critical violation and was managed at home. No postoperative complication occurred neither readmission was needed. A mean number of three hospitalization days was avoided and an estimated economic benefit of about EUR 500 for a single patient was obtained if compared with patients submitted to VATS lobectomy in the same period. These preliminary results confirm that adoption of telemonitoring allows, in selected patients, a safe discharge on postoperative day 2 after robotic surgery for early-stage NSCLC. A potential economic benefit could derive from this protocol if this data will be confirmed in larger sample.

Cost-Effectiveness of Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with a Novel Perioperative Protocol.

BACKGROUND: In 2015, a novel perioperative protocol (nPOP), comprising of 19 evidence-based interventions, was adopted as a standard practice for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) at the Humanitas Clinical and Research Center (Milan, Italy). Its implementation translated into lower complication rates, faster ambulation and return of bowel function, better nausea/vomiting and pain control, and, consequently, a shorter length of hospital stay. Because value of a patient's care cycle can be defined as clinical outcomes relative to costs, we aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of nPOP compared to the previously implemented protocols. METHODS: Three groups were identified and retrospectively analyzed: (A) 66 patients (September 2007 to March 2009) treated according to the traditional protocol; (B) 225 patients (April 2009 to March 2015) treated in line with a transitional protocol, incorporating 5 perioperative interventions; and (C) 103 patients (April 2015 to February 2019) treated according to nPOP. For each group a monetary value of required clinical resources and the actual total cost per patient from admission to discharge were determined. The following were analyzed (including nurse and anesthesiologist time): diagnostic tests, medications, materials, operating time, surgical team time, blood transfusion, ward stay, and intensive care unit stay. Two indicators of effectiveness were determined based on the postoperative outcomes: complication-free incidents and relative shortening of hospitalization time. A cost (€) of an improvement in effectiveness (%) was calculated. RESULTS: Alongside enhancement of clinical outcomes, nPOP constituted the cheapest approach. It consumed the least human and material resources, resulting in the direct reduction in the overall clinical cost per patient. The length-of-stay variable provided the largest reduction in total costs. The actual total clinical cost per patient in Group C was 26% lower than in Group A (4,437€ vs. 6,005€) and 39% lower than in Group B (4,437€ vs. 7,305€). Every unit of enhancement of clinical outcomes was 2.43 times more expensive for the traditional protocol and 2.23 times more costly for the transitional protocol compared to nPOP, making it the most cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: The nPOP for AAA open repair is not inferior to other perioperative protocols while allowing for efficient utilization of limited hospital resources, thus creating a high social value. The proposed methods for cost-effectiveness analysis are easily reproducible and therefore can be applied in future projects ranging from a micro- to a macro-economic scale.

Could We Safely Avoid a Second Resection in Selected Patients With T1 Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer? Preliminary Results of Cost-Effectiveness Study From HUmanitas New Indications for ReTUR (HuNIRe) Multicenter Prospective Trial.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess whether restaging transurethral resection (ReTUR) could be safely replaced with urine cytology (UC) and in-office fiexible cystoscopy in selected T1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Materials and Methods: This is an ongoing prospective multicenter trial enrolling patients diagnosed with T1 BC from 5 Italian centers. Patients with a macroscopically incomplete initial resection or absence of detrusor muscle were subjected to ReTUR according to European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. Conversely, those with a complete tumor resection at initial TUR underwent UC at 3-4 weeks and in-office fiexible white-light and narrow-band cystoscopy at 4-6 weeks. In case of positive UC, or evidence of recurrence at cystoscopy, ReTUR was performed within 2 weeks. Otherwise, patients started Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) induction course without ReTUR. The primary endpoint was to determine the feasibility and the clinical utility of not performing ReTUR in selected T1 NMIBC patients. The secondary endpoint was to perform a cost-benefit analysis of this alternative approach. Results: Since May 2020, among 87 patients presenting with T1, 76 patients were enrolled. Nineteen (25%) patients underwent standard ReTUR after initial resection, 10 (13.2%) due to the absence of the detrusor muscle and 9 (11.8%) due to a macroscopically incomplete initial TUR. Overall, 57 (75%) patients initially avoided immediate ReTUR and underwent UC plus in-office flexible cystoscopy. Among them, 38 (66.7%) had no evidence of residual disease and immediately started the BCG induction course. Nineteen patients (33.3%) underwent "salvage" ReTUR due to either positive UC (7; 12.3%) or suspicious cystoscopy (12; 21%). Considering only the patients who initially avoided the ReTUR, disease recurrence was observed in 10/57. The saving of resource for each safely avoided ReTUR was estimated to be 1,759 €. Considering the entire sample, we estimated a saving of 855 € per patient if compared with the EAU guideline approach. Conclusion: The preliminary results of our trial suggested that ReTUR might be safely avoided in highly selected T1 BC patients with a complete resection at first TUR. Longer follow-up and larger sample size are needed to investigate the long-term oncological outcomes of this alternative approach.

Outpatient Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Excision and Reconstruction: A Clinical, Economical, and Patient Perception Analysis.

Nonmelanoma skin cancers constitute more than 15% of all types of cancer. To obtain the best cosmetic outcome, local flaps represent the ideal surgical choice. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated from 2016 to 2019. The day-surgery group included 73 patients, and the outpatient group included 70 patients. We analyzed medical records regarding age of diagnosis, waiting time, site of lesion, reconstructive technique, histologic diagnosis, radicality of excision, and complications. We administered a survey based on quality items and carried out an economic evaluation. RESULTS: Outpatient removals were radical 92.6% of the time against the 78% of those performed in the operating room (P = 0.14). We observed two cases of wound dehiscence and two cases of hematoma in the day-surgery group. Economic analysis showed reduced costs in the outpatient setting. CONCLUSION: Skin excision and local flap reconstruction are safe procedures in an outpatient setting under a clinical, economical, and patient perception point of view.

Measuring the impact of complications after surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma: Is comprehensive complication index better than Clavien-Dindo Classification?

BACKGROUND: To compare the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) surgery in assessing the real burden of post-operative complications on both post-operative length of stay and total costs of hospitalization (PLOS and TCH, respectively). STUDY DESIGN: A series of 417 procedures for both primary and recurrent RPS between January 2000 and December 2017 was analyzed. Complications were classified according to both CDC and CCI. Univariable linear regressions were used to assess predictors associated with PLOS and TCH. Multivariable linear regression models were constructed to identify the factors independently associated with PLOS and TCH. RESULTS: Median PLOS was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR] 7-16); median TCH was 7033.5€ (IQR 1350-305.900). Post-operative complications occurred in 170/417 (40.7%) of the procedures and in 75/417 (17.9%) of the procedures CDCs >3 were identified. Sixty-four (15.34%) patients had more than one complication. Univariable linear regression showed that both PLOS and TCH were significantly associated to both CDC and CCI among other factors. Multivariable linear analyses selected CDC and CCI as independent prognostic factors for both PLOS and TCH. According to the AIC and BIC, models including CCI performed better (5559.53 and 5598.18, respectively, compared with 5561.31 and 5599.95 for CDC models). CONCLUSION: The CCI resulted to perform better than the CDC in describing the overall burden of complications after RPS surgery, both for clinical and economic purposes.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Fibromyalgia in Patients with Foot and Ankle Pain: The Experience of an Academic Podiatry Clinic.

Background and Objectives: Research about the prevalence of fibromyalgia in podiatric patients is limited, with data suggesting potentially higher estimates and greater foot impairment in patients with fibromyalgia compared to healthy individuals. The aim of our study is to assess the prevalence of fibromyalgia in the podiatric healthcare setting and to research the characteristics of fibromyalgia patients with foot or ankle disorders. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients visiting the academic podiatry clinic at the University of Bologna IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute between 11 January and 31 March 2021 were enrolled. Results: Of the 151 patients included, 21 met the fibromyalgia survey diagnostic criteria, accounting for a prevalence of 13.9% (95% CI 8.8-20.5). As part of the podiatric assessment, the Foot Function Index (FFI) was used to calculate the impact of foot and ankle problems. Moreover, patients with fibromyalgia were asked to complete the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQ). Fibromyalgia patients had significantly worse total FFI scores (63.4 ± 23.0% vs. 53.2 ± 20.3%, p = 0.038) and there was a significant linear correlation between the FFI and the FIQ (r = 0.72, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The prevalence of fibromyalgia in the academic podiatry clinic being 13.9% confirms that, in the healthcare setting, the disease can be more frequent than in the general population. Furthermore, our findings suggest a strong correlation between foot impairment and the impact of fibromyalgia.

Serum ANCA and Overall Mortality: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study on 1,024 Italian Subjects.

Background: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) are primarily involved in the pathogenesis of ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV). However, ANCA may also be present in healthy subjects and in patients with autoimmune disorders different from AAV. We hypothesized that serum ANCA are associated with a worse prognosis in disorders other than AAV. Objective: We investigated the association between the overall survival and the presence of serum ANCA in 1,024 Italian subjects with various testing indications in a 10-year interval. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, a population of 6,285 patients (many of whom were subsequently excluded due to our criteria) who tested for ANCA at a single center in 10 years was considered, and life status and comorbidities of subjects were collected. We compared the overall survival of ANCA-positive and ANCA-negative patients by means of Kaplan-Meier curves, while a multivariable adjusted Cox regression was used to evaluate the association between the ANCA status and the outcome (death) in terms of hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The positivity of perinuclear ANCA (pANCA) increased significantly mortality (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.10-2.32), while cytoplasmic ANCA (cANCA) positivity failed to show a significant association (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.77-2.68). The increased mortality rate was observed for both pANCA and cANCA in patients suffering from rheumatic disorders. No association was found between mortality and anti-MPO (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.20-2.00) or anti-PR3 (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.24-3.96) after adjusting for confounders. Conclusions: Serum pANCA and cANCA are independent negative prognostic factors in patients with concurrent autoimmune diseases.

A comparative cost analysis of transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Despite proven clinical benefits in the short term, technical difficulties limit utilization of laparoscopy in rectal cancer surgery (RCS). Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME) overcomes many technical limitations of laparoscopic RCS. However, the costs of this procedure have not been addressed yet. Our goal was to perform a comparative cost analysis of taTME and laparoscopic TME (lapTME). Consecutive patients undergoing curative TME between 1 February 2014 and 31 October 2018 were selected from a prospectively maintained database and stratified, according to the type of procedure, into taTME and lapTME groups. Patient demographics, tumour characteristics, operative parameters, and short-term outcomes were analyzed. The main outcome measure was intraoperative costs of the two procedures. Secondary outcomes were short-term outcome and the utilization of hospital resources to manage the postoperative course. Hundred and fifty-two patients with rectal cancer (66 lapTME, 86 taTME) were included in the study. Surgical supplies required for taTME procedure exceeded the cost of lapTME of 754,54 €. The duration of surgery was not significantly different between the two approaches (266 ± 92.85 vs 271 ± 83.63, p = 0.50). Short-term outcomes were comparable including postoperative complication rate (17 vs 20%, p = 0.68), reintervention rate, and length of stay. There was no difference in hospital resources utilization to manage postoperative course including blood test, diagnostics, consultations, and medications. TaTME has higher intraoperative costs in terms of supplies with respect to lapTME. Short-term outcomes and hospital resources to manage postoperative course are comparable.

Favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for lung cancer screening in Italy.

OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer detection by low-dose computed tomographic screening reduces mortality. However, it is essential to assess cost-effectiveness. We present a cost-effectiveness analysis of screening in Italians at high risk of lung cancer, from the point of view of the Italian tax-payer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a decision model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of annual screening for 5 years in smokers (≥30 pack-years) of 55-79 years. Patients diagnosed in the COSMOS study were the screening arm; patients diagnosed and treated for lung cancer in the Lombardy Region, Italy, constituted the usual care arm. Treatment costs were extracted from our hospital database. Lung cancer survival in screened patients was adjusted for 2-year lead-time bias. Life-years and quality-adjusted life-years were estimated by stage at diagnosis, from which incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per life-year and quality-adjusted life-year gained were estimated. RESULTS: Base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were 3297 and 2944 euro per quality-adjusted life-year and life-year gained, respectively. Deterministic sensitivity analysis indicated that these values were particularly sensitive to lung cancer prevalence, screening sensitivity and specificity, screening cost, and treatment costs for stage I and IV disease. From the probabilistic sensitivity analysis incremental cost-effectiveness ratios had a 98 % probability of being <25,000 euro (widely-accepted threshold) and a 55 % probability of being <5000 euro. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose computed tomographic screening is associated with an incremental cost of 2944 euro per life-year gained in high risk population, implying that screening can be introduced in Italy at contained cost, saving the lives of many lung cancer patients.

Value-Based Healthcare and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Implementation in a High-Volume Bariatric Center in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for patients affected by morbid obesity. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol increases clinical outcomes, but the most recent literature shows incomplete patients' adherence. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of applying a Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) strategy associated with ERAS to increase patients' engagement and outcomes. METHOD: A multiprofessional team redesigned the process considering ERAS recommendations and patients' feedbacks. Outcomes that matter to patients were defined with structured patients' interviews and collected in the electronic clinical record. Adherence to the pathway and the cost of the cycle of care were measured to demonstrate sustainability. A model was developed to grant its replicability. RESULTS: A total of 2.122 patients were included. The lowest adherence to the protocol for a single item was 82%. 74% of excess weight loss; 90% better comorbidities control; 77.5% had no pain after surgery; 61% no postoperative nausea and vomiting. Zero mortality; 1.8% overall morbidity; 0.4% readmission and reoperation rate within 30 days. The average length of stay is 2.1 days. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) documented increased productivity and quality of life. CONCLUSION: Building a caring relationship by a multidisciplinary team, adding patient wellness in a VBHC framework on top of ERAS as a patient-centered approach, increases patients' engagement and adherence to the pathway of care, resulting in better health outcomes (clinical and PROMs). The Value-Based Model is sustainable and replicable; it represents the prototype for redesigning other pathways and may become a model for other organizations.

Early Catheter Removal After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Prospective Single-institutional Randomized Trial (Ripreca Study).

BACKGROUND: The adoption of robotic technology in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) could lead to improvement in outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility, to compare functional outcomes, and to assess the economic benefits of removing catheter on the postoperative day (POD) 3 versus POD 5 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From September 2016 to May 2017, patients selected to undergo RARP for clinically localized PCa at a high-volume center were prospectively randomized into group 1 (POD 3; n=72) versus group 2 (POD 5, n=74). INTERVENTION: All patients underwent RARP with anatomical posterior and anterior reconstruction. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was to compare acute urinary retention (AUR) and urinary leakage rate in the two groups. The secondary endpoints were early and mid-term postoperative functional outcomes assessed through questionnaires (ICIQ-MLUTS, IPSS), early continence rate, and postoperative pain/discomfort (visual analog scale score). The economic impact of early catheter removal was also assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: AUR was reported in two (1.4%) cases, one for each study group (p=0.9). One case of vesicourethral leakage was reported (0.7%) in group 1. Urethral discomfort and pain at discharge was significantly higher in group 2 (p=0.03). In our clinical practice, POD 3 catheter removal approach would determine a saving of approximately €80 000 and 405 d of hospitalization yearly. The main limitation is the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Early catheter removal after RARP does not lead to an increase in perioperative complications. No negative effect on early and mid-term functional outcomes was observed. A significant impact on saving economic resources was reported. PATIENT SUMMARY: We demonstrated that early catheter removal has no negative effect on spontaneous voiding, complications, or urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Cost-effectiveness of second-line diagnostic investigations in patients included in the DANTE trial: a randomized controlled trial of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography.

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze the economic efficiency of second-line diagnostic investigations in patients with undetermined lung nodules. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all surgical cases included in the DANTE trial from 2001 to 2006 for lung cancer screening was performed. Overall, 217 patients and 261 lung nodules were analyzed. The cohort was divided into patients investigated with PET and/or computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy (PET-CTB protocol; N=100), compared with those assessed with serial low-dose CT scans (standard protocol; N=161). Outpatient's and inpatient's costs were expressed in euros and derived from the Italian National Health Service. Ineffective costs were defined as the cost of procedures that lead to avoidable surgical intervention. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of the two protocols was 91% for the standard (sensitivity 100%, specificity 91%, positive predictive value 26%, and negative predictive value 100%) and 90% for the PET-CTB protocol (sensitivity 98%, specificity 81%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 97%). Average costs for outpatient's diagnostics were 694 and 1.462 euros, respectively, for the standard and PET-CTB protocol. Average inpatient's costs for both protocols were 12.121 euros. The two protocols showed comparable effectiveness in terms of outpatient's costs (94 and 90%, respectively; P=0.252). Inpatient's costs were effective in 36% of cases monitored according to the standard protocol compared with 85% of patients investigated with PET-CTB protocol. Ineffective costs corresponded to 64 and 15%, respectively (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Despite a higher average cost for outpatient's diagnostics, the implementation of PET imaging with or without CT-guided needle biopsy in the workup of suspicious lung nodules results in reduced unnecessary harm and costs related to inpatient's procedures.

Cost analysis and outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions in an outpatient setting.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a minimally invasive treatment for early gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, is considered challenging and risky in the colorectum. As such, most patients undergoing ESD are hospitalized due to the perceived increased risk of adverse events. The aim of this study was to compare the costs, safety and efficacy of colorectal-ESD in an outpatient vs inpatient setting in a tertiary level center. METHODS: This is a retrospective study on consecutive patients admitted for colorectal-ESD. Patients were divided into outpatients (Group-A, same-day discharge), and inpatients (Group-B, admitted for at least one night). Data on overall costs, outcomes and adverse events were assessed for each group. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were considered. Fourteen were excluded because ESD was not performed due to intraprocedural suspicion of invasive cancer. Eighty-three patients were treated as outpatients (Group-A, 68%) and 39 (Group-B, 32%) were hospitalized. R0-rate was 90.4% in Group-A and 89.7% in Group-B(P = 0.98). One perforation occurred in Group-A (1.2%) and 2 in Group-B(5.1%, P = 0.2). Mean Length of stay (LOS) was 1 day for outpatients and 3.3 days for inpatients. Management of Group-A as outpatients produced a cost savings of 941€ on average per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient colorectal-ESD is a feasible, cost-effective strategy to manage superficial colorectal tumors with outcomes comparable to inpatient colorectal-ESD. By using proper selection criteria, outpatient ESD could be considered the first-line approach for most patients.